Once a journalist always a journalist.
That’s why my loyalties are sometimes split between journos and bloggers.
But last week, I had this incredible urge to hide my journalistic past…
I am talking about the FT article discussing… the internet in China (did we have time to talk about anything else last week!?). I have the feeling there are a number of things Westerners are not getting quite right.
The Kitten Killer of Hangzhou is one of them.
The FT has thrown this interesting internet phenomenon into the aren’t-the-Chinese-weird- and-a-little-primitive section and spewed the following sentence:
“Uncritical adoption of information from unchecked sources makes it easier to create a herd effect on the internet in China than elsewhere.”
Well, it’s not quite like that…
The video of a woman killing a kitten with her stiletto hills is no trivia. As my co-author Yang-May wrote in our book, the difference between this video and others of this kind on the Chinese web is that it became “the icon of a rallying call across China to stop animal abuse”.
As Paul Littlefair, senior programme manager in the International Department of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), mentioned in an interview with Yang-May, “this video was a turning point for animal welfare in China.”
The woman’s actions were discussed on blogs all over the country. As a result, an increasing number of papers were published in Chinese universities on the subject of the use of animals and its ethics. Searches for the words “animal welfare” on Baidu reached 1 million pages (up from 100,000 in 2005).
And in 2008, the RSPCA and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences’ Institute of Law teamed up and hosted an international conference in Beijing to discuss animal welfare legislation for China.
So disappointing none of this was mentioned in the FT ….
Would you believe there are still people out there who criticise social media for not being as accurate as print media….
|